Resonant Peer Review – Memoire
The Partnership Story
-
Provide a timeline of who or what made key insights (e.g., phase mapping 3/23 – idea proposed by Claude AI).
-
Provide 3–4 examples of your prompting and co-writing process, along with a brief quantitative synthesis (e.g., 30 prompts used, 600 lines of dialog received, 100 lines used verbatim).
-
Describe the roles that AI played during the research process (e.g., idea generation, journal discovery, mathematical modeling, or philosophical insight).
The Attribution Map
-
List 3–5 core claims or arguments. For each, describe:
-
Where it originated (human, AI, or shared)
-
Whether it evolved through iteration
-
Who had final editorial control
-
Include one visual or textual snapshot of a key insight evolving.
-
(Optional) Sketch a flowchart or diagram tracing idea origins.
The Independence Test
-
Outline what you could teach or present independently—without AI support.
-
Reflect on which aspects were AI-supported and how you'd grow into them.
-
(Optional) Share a 1-minute chalk talk or written summary of your project.
The Forward Commitment
-
Describe your commitment to carrying this work forward—where, how, and with whom.
-
Will you expand this work further? If not, why?
-
Discuss any ethical concerns (e.g., misuse, misinterpretation) and how you plan to address them.
The Surprise Journal
-
Share one or more moments of genuine surprise—intellectual, emotional, or collaborative.
-
Identify any challenges that arose: miscommunication, failed prompts, or growth edges.
-
Conclude with a short reflection: What did you learn about co-creation or authorship?
🌀 This Memoire is a living companion to your work. Treat it not as a checklist, but as a trail of breadcrumbs—honoring how you got here, and where you're going next.